CT2000P3PSSD8 vs LNM790X002T-RNNNU
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the LNM790X002T-RNNNU is the safer pick - the CT2000P3PSSD8 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
CT2000P3PSSD8
$71.58
LNM790X002T-RNNNU
$150.00
Endurance (TBW)
CT2000P3PSSD8
440 TB
LNM790X002T-RNNNU
1,500 TB
Price history
ES · cheapest per day
CT2000P3PSSD8 €149
LNM790X002T-RNNNU €331
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CT2000P3PSSD8 | LNM790X002T-RNNNU | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2 TB | 2 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | M.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 440 TB | 1,500 TB |
| DWPD | - | - |
| DRAM cache | No | No |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | - |
| Cost / TBW | $0.325 | $0.200 |
| Price / TB | $71.58 | $150.00 |
| Buy |
€149
View at Amazon →
|
€331
View at Amazon →
|
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CT2000P3PSSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
LNM790X002T-RNNNU
No Backblaze failure data for this model.