CT2000T500SSD8 vs MZ-77Q2T0
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the CT2000T500SSD8 is the safer pick - the MZ-77Q2T0 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
CT2000T500SSD8
$210.09
MZ-77Q2T0
$244.00
Endurance (TBW)
CT2000T500SSD8
1,200 TB
MZ-77Q2T0
720 TB
Price history
ES · cheapest per day
CT2000T500SSD8 €553
MZ-77Q2T0 €891
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CT2000T500SSD8 | MZ-77Q2T0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2 TB | 2 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | 2.5 |
| Interface | NVMe | SATA |
| NAND type | TLC | QLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 1,200 TB | 720 TB |
| DWPD | - | - |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | 160 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.350 | $0.678 |
| Price / TB | $210.09 | $244.00 |
| Buy |
€553
View at Amazon →
|
No ES price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CT2000T500SSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
MZ-77Q2T0
No Backblaze failure data for this model.