MZ-77Q1T0 vs ZP1000NM3A002
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the ZP1000NM3A002 is the safer pick - the MZ-77Q1T0 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Endurance (TBW)
MZ-77Q1T0
360 TB
ZP1000NM3A002
1,400 TB
Sustained write
MZ-77Q1T0
80 MB/s
ZP1000NM3A002
995 MB/s
Price history
ES · cheapest per day
MZ-77Q1T0 €296
ZP1000NM3A002 €253
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| MZ-77Q1T0 | ZP1000NM3A002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | 2.5 | M.2 |
| Interface | SATA | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 360 TB | 1,400 TB |
| DWPD | - | 0.7 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | - |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | 80 MB/s | 995 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.878 | - |
| Price / TB | $316.23 | - |
| Buy | No ES price yet | No ES price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
MZ-77Q1T0
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
ZP1000NM3A002
No Backblaze failure data for this model.