MTFDDAK1T9TGA vs MZ-77Q1T0
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the MTFDDAK1T9TGA is the safer pick - the MZ-77Q1T0 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
MTFDDAK1T9TGA
$333.27
MZ-77Q1T0
$296.99
Endurance (TBW)
MTFDDAK1T9TGA
5,256 TB
MZ-77Q1T0
360 TB
Sustained write
MTFDDAK1T9TGA
540 MB/s
MZ-77Q1T0
80 MB/s
Price history
IT · cheapest per day
MTFDDAK1T9TGA €397
MZ-77Q1T0 €295
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| MTFDDAK1T9TGA | MZ-77Q1T0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1.92 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Interface | SATA | SATA |
| NAND type | TLC | QLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 5,256 TB | 360 TB |
| DWPD | 1.5 | - |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | No |
| Sustained write | 540 MB/s | 80 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.122 | $0.825 |
| Price / TB | $333.27 | $296.99 |
| Buy | No IT price yet |
€295
View at Amazon →
|
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
MTFDDAK1T9TGA
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
MZ-77Q1T0
No Backblaze failure data for this model.