SBFPF2BV076T001 vs SEDC600M/7680G
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the SEDC600M/7680G is the safer pick - the SBFPF2BV076T001 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
SBFPF2BV076T001
$563.56
SEDC600M/7680G
$491.84
Endurance (TBW)
SBFPF2BV076T001
5,900 TB
SEDC600M/7680G
14,016 TB
DWPD
SBFPF2BV076T001
0.4
SEDC600M/7680G
1.0
Sustained write
SBFPF2BV076T001
1,800 MB/s
SEDC600M/7680G
530 MB/s
Price history
IT · cheapest per day
SEDC600M/7680G €755
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| SBFPF2BV076T001 | SEDC600M/7680G | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7.68 TB | 7.68 TB |
| Form factor | U.2 | 2.5 |
| Interface | NVMe | SATA |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 5,900 TB | 14,016 TB |
| DWPD | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained write | 1,800 MB/s | 530 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.734 | $0.270 |
| Price / TB | $563.56 | $491.84 |
| Buy | No IT price yet | No IT price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
SBFPF2BV076T001
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
SEDC600M/7680G
No Backblaze failure data for this model.