CT1000P3PSSD8 vs SFYRS/1000G
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the SFYRS/1000G is the safer pick - the CT1000P3PSSD8 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
CT1000P3PSSD8
$103.56
SFYRS/1000G
$256.44
Endurance (TBW)
CT1000P3PSSD8
220 TB
SFYRS/1000G
1,000 TB
Price history
UK · cheapest per day
CT1000P3PSSD8 £252
SFYRS/1000G £202
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CT1000P3PSSD8 | SFYRS/1000G | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | M.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 220 TB | 1,000 TB |
| DWPD | - | - |
| DRAM cache | No | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | - |
| Cost / TBW | $0.471 | $0.256 |
| Price / TB | $103.56 | $256.44 |
| Buy |
£252
View at Amazon →
|
£202
View at Amazon →
|
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CT1000P3PSSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
SFYRS/1000G
No Backblaze failure data for this model.