CT2000P3PSSD8 vs ZP2000NM3A002
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the ZP2000NM3A002 is the safer pick - the CT2000P3PSSD8 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Endurance (TBW)
CT2000P3PSSD8
440 TB
ZP2000NM3A002
2,800 TB
Price history
UK · cheapest per day
CT2000P3PSSD8 £309
ZP2000NM3A002 £474
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CT2000P3PSSD8 | ZP2000NM3A002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2 TB | 2 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | M.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 440 TB | 2,800 TB |
| DWPD | - | 0.7 |
| DRAM cache | No | - |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | 965 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.325 | - |
| Price / TB | $71.58 | - |
| Buy |
£309
View at Amazon →
|
No UK price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CT2000P3PSSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
ZP2000NM3A002
No Backblaze failure data for this model.