MZ7L37T6HBLA-00W07 vs SBFPF2BV076T001
Samsung MZ7L37T6HBLA-00W07 (7.68TB) versus Solidigm SBFPF2BV076T001 (7.68TB)
Verdict
For a NAS cache or any write-heavy pool, the MZ7L37T6HBLA-00W07 is the safer pick - the SBFPF2BV076T001 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows down badly under sustained writes. Only consider the SBFPF2BV076T001 for light, read-mostly storage.
| MZ7L37T6HBLA-00W07 | SBFPF2BV076T001 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7.68 TB | 7.68 TB |
| Form factor | 2.5 | U.2 |
| Interface | SATA | NVMe |
| NAND type | TLC | QLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 14,016 TB | 5,900 TB |
| DWPD | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained write | - | 1,800 MB/s |
| Price / TB | $624.35 | $427.10 |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price where available.