SEDC600M/1920G vs WDS100T1R0C
Kingston SEDC600M/1920G (1.92TB) versus WD WDS100T1R0C (1TB)
Verdict
Both are comparable SSDs. The SEDC600M/1920G is rated for more write endurance than the WDS100T1R0C, so it's the longer-lasting choice for a NAS that sees steady writes; for light use either is fine and price decides.
| SEDC600M/1920G | WDS100T1R0C | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1.92 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | 2.5 | M.2 |
| Interface | SATA | NVMe |
| NAND type | TLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 3,504 TB | 2,000 TB |
| DWPD | 1.0 | - |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | No |
| Sustained write | 530 MB/s | - |
| Price / TB | $670.26 | $281.97 |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price where available.