CT1000P3PSSD8 vs ZA1000NM1A002
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the ZA1000NM1A002 is the safer pick - the CT1000P3PSSD8 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Endurance (TBW)
CT1000P3PSSD8
220 TB
ZA1000NM1A002
1,400 TB
Price history
ES · cheapest per day
CT1000P3PSSD8 €123
ZA1000NM1A002 €154
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CT1000P3PSSD8 | ZA1000NM1A002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | 2.5 |
| Interface | NVMe | SATA |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 220 TB | 1,400 TB |
| DWPD | - | 0.7 |
| DRAM cache | No | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | - |
| Cost / TBW | $0.471 | - |
| Price / TB | $103.56 | - |
| Buy |
€123
View at Amazon →
|
No ES price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CT1000P3PSSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
ZA1000NM1A002
No Backblaze failure data for this model.