SBFPF2BV076T001 vs SSDPF2KX076T1
Solidigm SBFPF2BV076T001 (7.68TB) versus Solidigm SSDPF2KX076T1 (7.68TB)
Verdict
For a NAS cache or any write-heavy pool, the SSDPF2KX076T1 is the safer pick - the SBFPF2BV076T001 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows down badly under sustained writes. Only consider the SBFPF2BV076T001 for light, read-mostly storage.
| SBFPF2BV076T001 | SSDPF2KX076T1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7.68 TB | 7.68 TB |
| Form factor | U.2 | U.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 5,900 TB | 14,000 TB |
| DWPD | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained write | 1,800 MB/s | 4,200 MB/s |
| Price / TB | $427.10 | $482.03 |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price where available.