SBFPF2BV076T001 vs SSDPF2KX076T1
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the SSDPF2KX076T1 is the safer pick - the SBFPF2BV076T001 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
SBFPF2BV076T001
$563.56
SSDPF2KX076T1
$482.03
Endurance (TBW)
SBFPF2BV076T001
5,900 TB
SSDPF2KX076T1
14,000 TB
DWPD
SBFPF2BV076T001
0.4
SSDPF2KX076T1
1.0
Sustained write
SBFPF2BV076T001
1,800 MB/s
SSDPF2KX076T1
4,200 MB/s
Price history
US · cheapest per day
SBFPF2BV076T001 $2,474
SSDPF2KX076T1 $2,999
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| SBFPF2BV076T001 | SSDPF2KX076T1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7.68 TB | 7.68 TB |
| Form factor | U.2 | U.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 5,900 TB | 14,000 TB |
| DWPD | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained write | 1,800 MB/s | 4,200 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.734 | $0.264 |
| Price / TB | $563.56 | $482.03 |
| Buy | No US price yet | No US price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
SBFPF2BV076T001
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
SSDPF2KX076T1
No Backblaze failure data for this model.