CSSD-F1000GBMP700ENH vs CT1000P3PSSD8
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the CSSD-F1000GBMP700ENH is the safer pick - the CT1000P3PSSD8 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Endurance (TBW)
CSSD-F1000GBMP700ENH
600 TB
CT1000P3PSSD8
220 TB
Price history
US · cheapest per day
CT1000P3PSSD8 $200
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| CSSD-F1000GBMP700ENH | CT1000P3PSSD8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Form factor | M.2 | M.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | TLC | QLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 600 TB | 220 TB |
| DWPD | - | - |
| DRAM cache | No | No |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | - | - |
| Cost / TBW | - | $0.471 |
| Price / TB | - | $103.56 |
| Buy | No US price yet |
$200
View at Amazon →
|
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
CSSD-F1000GBMP700ENH
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
CT1000P3PSSD8
No Backblaze failure data for this model.