KCD8XRUG7T68 vs SBFPF2BV076T001
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the KCD8XRUG7T68 is the safer pick - the SBFPF2BV076T001 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Price / TB
KCD8XRUG7T68
$562.18
SBFPF2BV076T001
$563.48
Endurance (TBW)
KCD8XRUG7T68
14,016 TB
SBFPF2BV076T001
5,900 TB
DWPD
KCD8XRUG7T68
1.0
SBFPF2BV076T001
0.4
Sustained write
KCD8XRUG7T68
3,800 MB/s
SBFPF2BV076T001
1,800 MB/s
Price history
US · cheapest per day
KCD8XRUG7T68 $3,422
SBFPF2BV076T001 $2,474
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| KCD8XRUG7T68 | SBFPF2BV076T001 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7.68 TB | 7.68 TB |
| Form factor | U.2 | U.2 |
| Interface | NVMe | NVMe |
| NAND type | TLC | QLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 14,016 TB | 5,900 TB |
| DWPD | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss protection | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained write | 3,800 MB/s | 1,800 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.308 | $0.733 |
| Price / TB | $562.18 | $563.48 |
| Buy | No US price yet | No US price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
KCD8XRUG7T68
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
SBFPF2BV076T001
No Backblaze failure data for this model.