MZ-77Q2T0 vs ZP2000NM3A002
SSD head-to-head - specs, value and live price side by side.
Verdict
For a NAS cache or write-heavy pool, the ZP2000NM3A002 is the safer pick - the MZ-77Q2T0 uses QLC NAND, which wears out faster and slows badly under sustained writes (light, read-mostly use only).
Value at a glance
Endurance (TBW)
MZ-77Q2T0
720 TB
ZP2000NM3A002
2,800 TB
Sustained write
MZ-77Q2T0
160 MB/s
ZP2000NM3A002
965 MB/s
Price history
US · cheapest per day
MZ-77Q2T0 $490
ZP2000NM3A002 $164
zoomed ·
drag to zoom
| MZ-77Q2T0 | ZP2000NM3A002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2 TB | 2 TB |
| Form factor | 2.5 | M.2 |
| Interface | SATA | NVMe |
| NAND type | QLC | TLC |
| Endurance (TBW) | 720 TB | 2,800 TB |
| DWPD | - | 0.7 |
| DRAM cache | Yes | - |
| Power-loss protection | No | No |
| Sustained write | 160 MB/s | 965 MB/s |
| Cost / TBW | $0.681 | - |
| Price / TB | $245.00 | - |
| Buy |
$490
View at Amazon →
|
No US price yet |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger spec for a NAS build. Failure rates from Backblaze Drive Stats where available; $/TB uses the cheapest live price. Buy links are Amazon affiliate.
MZ-77Q2T0
No Backblaze failure data for this model.
ZP2000NM3A002
No Backblaze failure data for this model.